Találati lista | Tudóstér

001-es BibID:	BIBFORM104399
035-os BibID:	(cikkazonosító)102071 (WOS)000496900700005 (Scopus)85073143173
Első szerző:	Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:	Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing : An assessment / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Panagiotis Tsigaris, Aceil Al-Khatib
Dátum:	2019
ISSN:	0099-1333 1879-1999
Megjegyzések:	The issue of "predatory" publishing continues to affect many scholars around the world who publish. When one reads the fairly vast literature surrounding "predatory" publishing, there is an erroneous tendency to continue pivoting around Jeffrey Bean's blacklists of "predatory" open access (OA) journals and publishers. However, to be "predatory" involves much more than defining a handful of select behaviours, and it is becoming increasingly important to start defining, or curtailing, the lexicon to avoid referring to any journal or publisher that might display one of the following qualities (exploitative, deceptive, excessive, unscrupulous, abusive, advantageous, manipulative, profit-seeking, or others) as synonymously meaning "predatory". This paper focuses mainly on the oft-interchangeable terms "predatory" and "exploitation", and explores the morality of predatory and exploitative actions by applying a deontological ethics approach which implies that certain actions are wrong even if they achieve good consequences, with the understanding that because a predatory entity aims to exploit others, these actions would be considered morally wrong from a deontologist's perspective. In articulating our argument, we attempt to expand the conversation around this important topic, with the hope that it might bring additional clarity to the issue of what might constitute a "predatory" journal or publisher.
Tárgyszavak:	Társadalomtudományok Média- és kommunikációs tudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban folyóiratcikk Beall Blacklists Deontological ethics Exploitation Predatory behaviour Whitelists
Megjelenés:	Journal of Academic Librarianship. - 45 : 6 (2019), p. 1-8. -
További szerzők:	Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus) Tsigaris, Panagiotis Al-Khatib, Aceil
Internet cím:	Szerző által megadott URL DOI Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon:

001-es BibID:	BIBFORM104397
035-os BibID:	(WOS)000461845500013 (Scopus)85061674730
Első szerző:	Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Cím:	Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers / Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki
Dátum:	2019
ISSN:	0099-1333 1879-1999
Megjegyzések:	The objective of this study was to assess how 14 large and established scientific publishers have adopted the use of preprints and how their policies changed in a one-year period between June 2017 and June 2018, if any. The core search was performed using the Sherpa/RoMEO database. Of all publishers (2516, now 2553) listed in the RoMEO database, 80.3% of the publishers examined allow self-archiving, but only half of the publishers (47.3%) allow the archiving of preprints in February of 2018, while this percentage increased to 48% in June 2018. These data were practically constant over a one-year period even as the number of preprint servers has increased. Several exceptions exist among journals within each of the tested Sherpa/RoMEO-indexed publishers, and in some cases, a reversal in policy was observed, i.e., from allowing to no longer allowing the archival of preprints.
Tárgyszavak:	Társadalomtudományok Média- és kommunikációs tudományok idegen nyelvű folyóiratközlemény külföldi lapban folyóiratcikk ASAPbio bioRxiv Peer review Preprint server Sherpa/RoMEO
Megjelenés:	Journal of Academic Librarianship. - 45 : 2 (2019), p. 162-170. -
További szerzők:	Dobránszki Judit (1967-) (biológus)
Internet cím:	Szerző által megadott URL DOI Intézményi repozitóriumban (DEA) tárolt változat
Borító:
Saját polcon: